Year of 100 Films: 23 – The Witcher: Nightmare of the Wolf

This animated film from Netflix was released in 2021 year and tied into the live action Witcher TV series that starred Henry Cavill. The voice cast list included Theo James, Graham McTavish, Mary McDonell, Tom Cantrell, Lara Pulver, Jennifer Hale and Kari Whalgreen.

Plot: One of the characters introduced in the second series of the Witcher was Geralt’s mentor Vesemir. This was the origin of Vesemir. from his early life as a servant alongside his friend Ilyana through his early, brutal training at the hands of Deglan to his career as a Witcher, battling monsters for coin.

As he goes through his life, the world’s view of witchers has soured, most seeing them as unpleasant necessities at best and unscrupulous snake oil salesmen at worst. A mage at a local court called Tetra is trying to convince everyone at court that witchers should be exterminated as they seem to be exasperating the problem as they need the monsters to exist to get coin. An older Lady of the court, who is there as a holdover from her late husband’s position tries to offer the opposing view as an increase in monster activity. Things come to a head, when knights of the local area pick a fight with Vesemir and Luka, one of his fellow witchers and one of the knights ends up dead.

To clear this, Vesemir goes with Tetra to find a local monster, to prove the witchers have a purpose. They find a monster and the bodies of several elves, finding one of them, Filavandrel, alive. Vesemir and Tetra destroy this monster’s den. Filavandrel confirms that the local monster was an elf woman, altered by Deglan to become a monster. Tetra leaves to alert the kingdom and Vesemir goes to confront Deglan. When Tetra encounters the monster, formally an elf named Kitsu, she convinces Kitsu it was the witchers who did all the damage and she should attack them. Now convinced of the witcher’s complicity she convinces the people of the kingdom to attack the witchers’ home of Kaer Morhen and the king to execute Luka.

Vesemir speaks to Deglan, who confirms that he is in fact creating monsters, to ensure there’s work for witchers to do, ensuring their way of life. The Lady who spoke up for the witchers (now revealed as Ilyana) arrives and warns the witchers that they are about to be under attack. As monsters, knights and villagers descend on Kaer Morhen, Vesemir tries to save the recruits and then get the other witchers there to defend their home from angry villagers, a vengeful mage and a monster. By the end, almost everyone is dead or dying. Tetra asks for Vesemir to train the recruits to be better men that the ones that came before. Vesemir takes a dying Ilyana to a nearby lake, a place she wanted to live when they were young and she dies in his arms.

With Kaer Morhen in flames and everyone in it dead, Vesemir and the recruits (including a young Geralt of Rivia) are the last of any witchers that can be. Vesemir finds the escaped recruits and despite never wanting to teach or mentor, takes these trainees to make sure their way of live carries on, just better than before.

Notes: Not familiar with the Witcher before the show, I had no dog in this fight when it came to spin-offs. However, I did enjoy the mini series Blood Origin and so felt that Nightmare of the Wolf was at least worth checking out.

I’m unconvinced it was. The characters were thin and somewhat stock. The story, whilst interesting in the examination of the economics of monster hunting as part of a gig economy, the story telegraphs it’s twists and it becomes kind of boring near the end. The fight sequences are flashy and all that, but honestly the live action stuff has a visceral impact that animation doesn’t really do. This film is aggressively mediocre, sort of a lesser film trying to add itself to a franchise full of better product. If you like animated films, it’s a competent one of them, but it doesn’t match up with the other Witcher shows and so, I do feel it’s only worthwhile for completists and when it comes to this, I’m not. 4/10

Year of 100 Films: 24 – Taken

This 2008 film was co-written by Luc Besson, directed by Pierre Morel and starred Liam Neeson along with Famke Janssen, Xander Berkley, Maggie Grace, Katie Cassidy, Leland Orsey, Olivier Rabourdin, Arben Bajraktaraj, Gerard Watkins, Nicholas Giraud and Radivoje Bukvic.

Plot: Retired from some ill-defined intelligence job, Brian Mills is trying to maintain a good relationship with his teenage daughter, Kim. He deals with his antagonistic ex Lenore and her wealthy new husband, but does so with a goal. He moonlights as security, protecting popstar Sheera, who he asks about getting into singing (his daughter’s dream) and catches up with his old work friends. One lunchtime, he’s ambushed by Kim and Lenore, who want authorisation for Kim (17 years old at this point) to travel through Europe. Brian, after years of danger is not keen on the idea, but is shamed into it. He gives Kim a phone and gives specific instructions, so that he know’s she is okay. Kim and her friend Amanda fly to Paris and are met by Peter, a charming student who offers to share a cab and invites them to a party. Kim and Amanda are enjoying the new place, but Kim gets a call from Brian, then takes it in a different room and while on the phone with her dad, sees Amanda taken. Brian informs her that she’ll be taken too, but it will be okay. She is taken and one of the men who take her picks up the phone and Brian delivers one of the best tough guy monologue since Dirty Harry

“I don’t know who you are. I don’t know what you want. If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don’t have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my daughter go now, that’ll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don’t, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you.”

Then using his friends’ information and Lenore’s husband’s resources, Brian heads to Paris in search of an Armenian gang who are known to be operating a people trafficking ring. What follows is, well lets be honest a rampage as a desperate man tries to find his daughter. Being caught doesn’t scare him, being killed doesn’t scare him and he does exactly what he said he’d do, now there’s a ticking clock before his daughter is lost forever.

Notes: I love this film. When I first saw it, I was not the parent of a teenager, now I am, it hits different, I saw this with my son and his mother and it was an excellent family film that everyone enjoyed. The violence wasn’t glossy, but visceral. The tone of the film remained tense and frenetic and you were never bored. I don’t want to talk more about this film, because it’s worth checking, although I understand the sequels are less than, but this was a lot of fun. 8/10

Year of 100: 25 – Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

This film was a way to cash in on the 1980’s indie-comics/pop culture phenom that was the TMNT franchise. Created by Kevin Eastman and Peter Laird (who co-wrote this film with Bobby Herbeck) as a homage to Frank Miller’s run on Daredevil, it was licensed into a toy line and cartoon series until finally being made into this 1990 Steve Barron helmed adaptation. Human stars Judith Hoag, Elias Koteas, James Saito and Toshishiro Obata worked alongside with stunt performers and voice actors including Josh Pais, Brian Tochi, Robbie Rist, Corey Feldman, Kevin Clash and Michael McConnohie all while working with the Jim Hensen creature workshop, this was an ambitious endeavour before the cameras even started rolling.

Plot: In a very movie New York, a crime wave is spreading through the city, one lone TV journalist (April O’Neil) is trying to find the truth. She is confronted one night by members of the Foot Clan and before anything can happen to her, her attackers are soundly beaten and left tied up nearby. April doesn’t see her saviours, but we do. They are four mutated turtle people, who talk like teenagers, carrying medieval japanese weaponry and wearing cloth masks over their eyes. They return to a sort of bunker where a talking rat in what appears to be a kimono. They address the rat as Splinter and defer to him as a teacher, but more a father. He talks to his sons, the solemn Leonardo, the clever Donatello, the happy go lucky Michaelangelo and the angry Raphael. He talks of the need for secrecy and Raphael storms out. He goes the cinema (disguised in the comics mainstay trenchcoat and fedora) and on his way out takes on some criminals in mid-robbery but is interrupted by the sports themed vigilante Casey Jones. After that battle ends in a draw Raphael finds April in her TV station’s car park, once again facing the Foot. She runs to a local train station, but is knocked out and left on the subway track, Raphael saves her and takes her home. Unknowingly followed by a Foot soldier. When she wakes, she is terrified of the 5 mutants she is faced with. Splinter explains their origins as a rat who was a ninja master’s pet and 4 turtles who fell into a sewer grate, they all fell in some ooze and mutated from there.

We then move to the gang who are doing all the crimes (now including April’s boss’ son Danny) and we learn that this street gang and the more ninja-esque Foot are under the command of a man known as the Shredder. The Shredder is interested in the warriors who bested his men and wants the Foot to find them, he talks of brotherhood as he and his aide reward warriors for their skill with the Foot Clan masks. When April is escorted home by the turtles, the Foot attack and kidnap Splinter and the turtles visit April, unsure what to do without their father. The next morning, Danny and his dad visit April and Danny sees one of the brothers, later that day, the boy tells Shredder and the Foot descends on April’s home. The turtles over outnumbered and overwhelmed and it takes Casey’s appearance after seeing the battle from his rooftop, to save the turtles and April and head upstate to safety and to buy time for Raphael to heal as he took the brunt of the fight.

As Splinter is held by the Shredder, the boys try to pick themselves up and find their way and using some wooly metaphysical thing make contact with Splinter’s spirit and head back to city, ready to fight. They arrive at their home and find a gang of Foot there and rested and ready, the Foot are no match for the turtles and when they get reinforcements, the battle goes to the streets, but no better for the Foot. Casey finds Danny and through him rescues Splinter, but by then Shredder has arrived. He make short work of the turtles, but Splinter, who met Shredder years earlier is able to turn the tables and Shredder ends up swan diving off a roof into a bin lorry, where he’s apparently crushed. By the time the police have arrived, only the street kids, who give up the warehouse where the stolen goods are and the unconscious Foot Clan are left and the turtles, who are workshopping a catchphrase) are given Cowabunga by Splinter, who finds that (and himself) hilarious.

Notes: TMNT is the herpes of pop culture franchises, it never goes away for long, it always comes back. How many relaunches, reboots and reimagining attempts have their been? Seriously though? Comics have relaunched several times, cartoon series at least 4 different ones that I can think of straight away, including this 4 different feature film starts. How does it keep going? Because it works. A parody (homage) of the ninja filled Daredevil comics of the 1980’s it’s a pretty blatant love letter. Raphael wears red and carries a Sai, so did Elektra. Daredevil had the Hand, TMNT has the Foot. Daredevil’s mentor was Stick, TMNT has Splinter. It’s such a basic idea, teenagers with ninja skills, battle crime in New York. It’s an easier sell than say Spider-Man, or even Batman. This for me, is the best of those adaptations I’ve seen. Is that because the acting is better? It is a little better, but no. Is it because the story is stronger? No, although it is well told. The reason that it works so well is that it still works so well. The CGI animated feature and the live action with CGI character version that came out a few years ago, all feel dated and a little bloated in places. This 90’s version with it’s practical effects and choreographed action sequences still does all of the things it did back then. It delivers what is needed and nothing else. Do the suits look silly? Yes. But so did the CGI ones, this feels like a strong film that adapts a story well and keeps you interested up until the final credits and lets be honest, does it need to do owt else?

It fun and a nice bank holiday film that entertained both me and my son and I can’t say further than that. 8/10

Year of 100 Films: 26 Star Trek

It will come as NO surprise to anyone who reads this, that I’m a trekkie. (I don’t do the whole trekkie/trekker debate, I am what I am) Since I saw the pilot to Star Trek the Next Generation back in 1988. I love the utopian vision of a humanity that has got it’s shit together. I love the tech, the stories and the scope of what tales can be done. But it’s not 1966 any more and sometimes people want to update some things, hence 2009’s Star Trek by J.J. Abrams. This film recast the characters from the original series with current/younger actors including Bruce Greenwood as Captain Christopher Pike, Chris Pine as James T Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock, Karl Urban as Dr. Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy, Zoe Saldana as Nyota Uhura, John Cho as Hikaru Sulu, Simon Pegg as Montgomry Scott and the late Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov. There was also non-crew casting of Ben Cross as Sarek, Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson, Eric Bana as Nero, Rachel Nicholas as Gaila, Jennifer Morrison and Chris Hemsworth as Kirk’s parents and Leonard Nimoy as an older Spock.

Plot: In the 23rd Century, Earth is part of the United Federation of Planets, exploration and peacekeeping are handled by Star Fleet. One ship, the USS Kelvin encounters a huge Romulan ship, captained by a man calling himself Nero. Nero disables the Kelvin and demands it’s captain come across in surrender. Nero is looking for a man called Ambassador Spock, when the captain admits he doesn’t know, he is killed, leaving Lt. Kirk in command. Kirk orders an evacuation, including his wife who is in the midst of labour. Lt. Kirk then flies a suicide run to disable the other ship, long enough to cover the evacuation, born on one of the shuttles is Kirk’s son, who he lives long enough to name, James. Years later, on Vulcan, we see a half human/half vulcan called Spock, struggling to assimilate both sides of himself and eventually decides to leave his home and join Starfleet, rather than deal with the near-racist sneers from his father’s people.

We then meet James later, a smart, but angry child who grows into an angry adult, who’s met by Christopher Pike, a captain in Starfleet, who points out that Kirk’s father was captain of a ship for only minutes and saved hundreds of lives, he dares Kirk to do better. So, on a dare an angry James T Kirk joins Starfleet along with a friend he makes on the shuttle there, Dr Leonard McCoy.

3 Years later and over 20 years since the Kelvin incident and Kirk is in his final days at Starfleet Academy, when he takes the unbeatable Kobiashi Maru test, when he beats it, he has to face it’s designer when accused of cheating, that’s when he meets Spock. Then Vulcan is calling for help. The graduating class are all put into service, being assigned to ships, except Kirk, but he’s sneaked onto the flagship ,the USS Enterprise (where Uhura, Chekov and Sulu are already serving) by Bones. When he wakes he tries to warn the ship that they’re heading into a trap, since the reports are identical from the day he was born. Nero has come to Vulcan. By being late in leaving, the Enterprise is spared the massacre committed on the rest of the fleet and Nero again calls the captain to negotiate a surrender. Pike gets Spock to take command and puts Kirk in the number 2 spot. The mission goes badly and using some illdefined tech, Nero destroys Vulcan. Spock saves as many as he can, but while he saves his father and many of the elders, he loses his mother. Things fall apart further as Nero leaves and Kirk wants to go after him, knowing that Earth may be his next stop. Spock removes Kirk and abandons him on a nearby planet. On this nearby planet, Kirk meets the older Spock, who explains the plot. Near the end of the 24th Century, Romulus’ sun explodes, Vulcan sent their fastest ship along with the gravity altering red-matter (the same stuff that just destroyed Vulcan) to save the planet, but get there too late. The attempt opens up a black hole, dropping Nero and Spock in the past, about 20 something years apart. Spock takes Kirk to a nearby outpost, where they find Montgomery Scott. Spock (the older) shows Scott the formula for transwarp beaming that he won’t invent for 20 years and they use it to get back onto the Enterprise to usurp Spock’s command and take the Enterprise to try to save Earth, now with everyone aware that this is new timeline, with different histories over the last quarter century. In the end, this younger crew find a way to save the day and work as a team doing it. With Pike saved, then promoted, James T Kirk is promoted to Captain and brings on Scotty and Spock, after the younger Spock meets his elder/alternate self. The film ends at the start of a five year mission.

Notes: The last Trek film was Nemesis, which was bad. It had the usual cast of the Next Generation as well as Tom Hardy and Ron Perlman and yet, was bad. So we needed something to be done differently. The cast do well and we get new and interesting interpretations of these classic characters. Everything looks fine, it’s all cool and shiny (we’re going to ignore the lens flares) and the action is amazing and one that level, this is a fun, action oriented sci-fi film with familiar characters. But the problem is, it is called Star Trek and this film is not Star Trek.

Star Trek is thinking sci-fi that looks at universal ideas, or contemporary ideas through a future lens and speaks to the highest ideals of humanity. This doesn’t. That’s not to say it’s a bad film, but it is bad Trek. Where is the intelligent solution, where is the analogue for something we recognise? Where’s the message, where’s the hope? As Trek it’s a 4/10, but outside of that it’s a fun couple of hours that anyone can enjoy. 8/10

Year of 100 Films: 27 – The Equaliser 2

This 2018 sequel was directed by the same director and had the same lead in Antoine Fuqua and Denzel Washington. It also had a returning Melissa Leo and Bill Pullman with new additions Pedro Pascal, Ashton Sanders and Johnathan Scarfe.

Plot: After the events of the previous film, Robert McCall is living two lives, one is a lyft/uber driver being part of people’s lives and being the reliable stand-up guy he was before. He also helps out in other ways, helping reunite a mother and daughter, avenging a rape victim and keeping local artist Miles from getting involved in gang violence. He’s happier, helping people and also living the quiet life he sought. Then when his last friend from the old days is killed, McCall has to find her killer amongst old friends who thought he was dead and now seek to put him in the ground personally in a third act taking place at the home Robert shared with his departed wife.

Notes: So here’s the thing, there is nothing at all wrong with this film. The story starting with our protagonist rescuing a child from her kidnapper on a train, to his new life in a new building is all well and good. There are a couple of action set pieces where he gets to dispense justice and the main plot is interesting as past and present collide. But, the first one is better. This isn’t bad, but it isn’t as good as the last one. The action scenes are very good, the third act takes place during a hurricane and it all works really well, but the last one was better and it’s hard to avoid the comparison. If I ever watch these films again (they made a third one, so that’s a maybe) I’ll watch something else between the two. All in all, if you like the last one, you’ll like this one and not being as good, still makes it 8/10

Year of 100 Films: 28 – The Equaliser

Another recommendation from the MIGHTY Rosie was this 2014 adaptation of the TV show The Equaliser.

This film had strong cast centred around Denzel Washington (as former covert operative Robert McCall) and included Chloe Grace Moritz, Marton Csokas, David Harbour, David Meunier, Johnny Skourtis, Vladimir Kulich, Melissa Leo and briefly Bill Pullman.

Plot: Widower Robert McCall has left his former life behind and is living a small life, working in a US version of B&Q in Chicago. He’s kind to his neighbours, helpful with his colleagues in work and since he can’t sleep is a regular at an open all hours cafe near his home, where he often is found reading a book. One of the other regulars is call girl called ‘Teri’ who is working for the russian mob, when she is badly beat up, Robert wants to help and offers to buy her contract for just under $10,000. This amount seems to be all of the money he has, when that negotiation descends into the threat of immediate violence, we learn what Robert used to do. In under a minute all of the people in the room with him (about 4 or 5) are dead. When the russian syndicate they worked for investigate it starts a chain of events that leads to a war between a criminal gang and a guy who sells tools and lumber, when the criminals start targeting people close to Robert, it’s kill, or be killed.

Notes: I always enjoy the sub-genre of action films that boil down to “you don’t know who you just messed with”. They are often fast paced and get going almost immediately and this film ….. didn’t. There’s tons of set up as we see a grieving man battling OCD trying to live a life without the person who made that worthwhile for him. He’s reading the books that she wanted to read and tries to be a good man. The build up to the action scenes are paced incredible well and nothing feels rushed. When the film turns, it seems to happen just at the right time and as a result the impact of the visceral fight scenes is greater. It plays with ideas of redemption, or second chances and also with our own natures. It’s an understated performance added to decent enough action and this was overall a very satisfying action film that came as a wonderful surprise. 9/10

Year of 100 Films: 29 – Top Gun: Maverick

It’s hard to imagine that watching Top Gun, just days before wasn’t building towards watching this, a sequel to a film, seemingly made for nostalgic reasons. Knowing a few people who had seen it, I asked for opinions and the one I got most often was “it’s actually good”. This wasn’t encouraging, but all three of us wanted to give it a go, so we sought it out. It was released in 2022, directed by Joseph Kosinki and had a cast of Jennifer Connelly, Miles Teller, Jon Hamm, Bashir Salahuddin, Charles Parnell, Monica Barbaro, Jay Ellis, Glen Powell and reprising their roles Val Kilmer as Admiral Tom ‘Iceman’ Kazinsky and Tom Cruise as Captain Pete ‘Maverick’ Mitchell.

Plot: Many years after the events of the movie and his heyday, Pete Mitchell is a test pilot, never really promoted above Captain, he is a pilot who refuses to be anything other than a pilot, when his test plane project is shut down in favour of drones, he steals the plane and does the test successfully, only to crash the bird once he as always pushes to hard. Rather than be kicked out as he probably should be, he’s brought in to teach a new generation of combat pilots how to pull of a mission to prevent a airbase being completed and destabilising Europe. It doesn’t go well as Maverick isn’t a teacher and the pilots are as full of themselves as he was. Back at the old airbase, he finds himself at a local bar with an old flame running it and she doesn’t have time for him, nor do his COs at the base. On top of all that is one of the pilots, Rooster, being the son of Goose who blames him not only for his father’s death, but tanking his chances to join the Navy years earlier.

Now he has to prove himself as a pilot, as a teacher and a man and he’s not doing well at any of them. The final problem is that he looks like he’s the best person to lead this mission, which does not have good odds of survival for the pilots. Now looking like the last of an old breed of pilots, can he win the girl, make peace with the son of Goose and mourn the loss of his friend and often saviour, Iceman.

Notes: I don’t know who was asking for this film. It looks entirely set up as a nostalgia-fest, much like the Ghostbusters film from a couple of years ago. But honestly it did seem to have something to say. Maverick was the hot shot up and comer, but now a generation has gone by and he’s the old guard. He still has the stuff, but he’s out of place in a Navy that’s relying less on people and more on tech and he’s an analogue hero in a digital world. He has to deal with all the mistakes he has made and all the missed opportunities. Whilst we do have a whole bunch of new pilots and co-pilots (Phoenix, Fanboy, Bob and Hangman along with others) really this is about Pete Mitchell’s midlife crisis and quest for relevance. Of course he’s the only man who can do the mission, or course he’s going to go back for the man he left behind and of course he’ll win the day because of who he is and despite it, but this film does showcase that there’s a cost to this. Maverick has been the hotshot rebel\ who plays by his own rules, but that’s cost him advancement, kept at the rank of captain, whilst his top gun rival was a fleet admiral. He’s given his life to the Navy, costing him more than one chance to be happy. He tried to spare his best friend’s son from dying like his father, only to create resentment between them.

This film raises questions, but doesn’t really go out of it’s way to answer any of them, it raises them around the plot and lets you carry them on. In a world that’s become more mechanised and digitalised, is there still a place for a more old fashioned and seat of their pants hero? If not, should we make one? Do we need heroes like that still?

I was not keen to watch this, feeling that Cruise is somewhat over-rated and many of his films are formulaic and lack substance, this is a sequel to one of those, but it is deeper than that and overall a really satisfying watch. It’s worth checking out and my saying that was quite a surprise. 8/10

Year of 100 Films: 30 – Jason and the Argonauts

This 1963 bank holiday perennial was directed by Don Chaffey and had a cast which included Todd Armstrong, Nancy Kovack, Gary Raymond, Laurence Naismith, Niall McGinnis, Honor Blackman, Jack Gwillim, Douglas Wilmer, Nigel Green, Bill Gudgeon and a pre-Doctor Who Patrick Troughton.

Plot: After his family is murdered by a treasonous usurper, Jason lives in exile, but returns to take his kingdom back from King Pelias. Jason is convinced by Pelias (without knowing that’s who he is) to go and retrieve the Golden Fleece, on an island at the end of the known world. He helps him get a ship builder to build him a ship as well as a crew of the greatest heroes of the time (including Heracles, going by the roman name of Hercules) and they set off with Acastus working as a double agent.

On Olympus, Hera takes interest in Jason’s plight and wants to help, Zeus plays against her and they each take turns putting aid and obstacles in their way. They travel to an island guarded by the metal man Talos, then another where harpies torment a starving man. They travel through treacherous rocks and recover Medea, the last survivor of a ship from the island they are heading too. There are betrayals and violence as Jason and his men face the Hydra to get the fleece and then an army of skeleton warriors to escape the island and return to claim his throne.

Notes: This is another bank holiday film, weirdly not one we watched on a bank holiday. This was a sort of companion piece to Clash of the Titans, despite the only thing they both had in common was that both of them had a special effects department that was one guy called Ray. The actors aren’t the stars, the story isn’t the star, the star is the effects by Ray Harryhausen. From the Hydra, to Talos and the skeleton warriors, these effects while dated, had an abundance of charm. It added value to a film that would have little to recommend it. With my son being currently obsessed with Greek Myth, it was an easy win and am glad he enjoyed it. Overall it’s a bank holiday classic for a reason and it’ll come out again am sure. 6/10

Year of 100 Films: 31 – Top Gun

Though not his first film, this 1986 Tony Scott film can be considered the film that turned Tom Cruise into a superstar. It has an iconic status in 1980’s films and has been joked about and lampooned so often, but I don’t actually remember the film itself, so I fixed that. The cast is quite a murderer’s row with Tom Cruise, Anthony Edwards, Meg Ryan, Tom Skerritt, Tim Robbins, Michael Ironside, James Tolkan, Kelly McGillis and Val Kilmer.

Plot: After a crisis in a plane costs a pilot his career, second place pilot Pete ‘Maverick’ Mitchell and his co-pilot Nick ‘Goose’ Bradshaw are given the chance to join the US Navy’s advanced training course, known colloquially as Top Gun. Cocky and abrasive, Maverick doesn’t fit in around the rest of the pilots, especially his main rival ‘Iceman’. Maverick meets Charlie, a government specialist working with the Navy and the two begin an affair. There’s then a visit from Goose’s wife and son. Part way through the training there is an accident, Maverick is able to get out of the cockpit, but Goose hits the canopy and dies before he hits the water. This takes Maverick out of the game for a while, losing the race to be #1 at Top Gun. This takes a back seat in importance as a mission comes up, this class must work together and get the job done.

Notes: There’s a routine by the comedian Rich Hall about the plot of many Tom Cruise films and the formulaic nature of them. This is kind of the start of that. We get the talented hero, the fall from grace, the love of a good woman and the return to greatness and victory. But that said, this isn’t bad. Is it a bit jingoistic? Yes. Is it a bit homoerotic? Just a touch, but this is better than you expected it is. The film hinges on the relationship between Mav & Goose and in that, it works wonderfully. Edwards and Cruise sell the idea of best friends, despite being in very different points in their lives. When Goose dies, the film finds it’s pathos and you’re in it for the rest of the film. The film is beautifully shot, the aerial sequences are gorgeous and it has a blockbuster feel to it, it’s a film that’s so known, it gets overlooked and I’m glad that I finally got to it and would recommend it to everyone.

Is it a bit thin plot wise? Yes. Characterisation is very low level, but it fits with the time it was made, its gung-ho action and well made gung-ho action and despite it’s flaws, it is worth trying. 7/10

Year of 100 Films: 32 – The Princess Bride

This 1987 bank holiday classic, directed by Rob Reiner was released in 1987 and had a massive cast which included (deep breath) Cary Elwes, Robin Wright, Mandy Patinkin, Andre the Giant, Wallace Shawn, Chris Sarandon, Christopher Guest, Mel Smith, Carol Kane, Billy Crystal and in the framing sequence Peter Falk and Fred Savage and a fantastic scene with Peter Cook.

Plot: A boy is sick, his grandfather arrives to read a book to the boy that has become a family tradition when someone is sick. The story is a medieval tale of a woman called Buttercup, who having fallen in love with a stable boy, watches him leave so he can earn his fortune and come back and marry her. He is killed by the Dread Pirate Roberts and so years later, she finds herself betrothed to Prince Humperdink. Days before her wedding, she is kidnapped by a trio of criminals, scheming Vizzini, the gigantic Fessick and vengeful swordsman Inigo Montoya. They are followed by a masked man, later identified as the Dread Pirate Roberts, who bests each of them, killing Vizzini, in order to save the princess. She then learns that Roberts is actually her stable boy Wesley. We then have betrayals, kidnappings, giant rats, torture, wizards and long awaited revenge as we head for a happy ever after.

Notes: This is a perfect film. Action sequences are fun and exciting, enough romance to make it a love story, but still poking fun at it and dialogue that’s equally funny and quotable. “Mawwidge”, “Have fun storming the castle.” “I’m not a witch, I’m your wife!” and obviously “Hallo! My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father, prepare to die!” If you know this film, no more than that needs saying, if you haven’t, you need to, it’s a film that feels like a bank holiday Monday when you were a kid and that’s always worth a try. I genuinely love this film and watch it at least once per year. 10/10